News
News Home
Quick Bites
Exploradio
News Archive
News Channel
Special Features
NPR
nowplaying
On AirNewsClassical
Loading...
  
School Closings
WKSU Support
Funding for WKSU is made possible in part through support from the following businesses and organizations.

Hennes Paynter Communications

Meaden & Moore


For more information on how your company or organization can support WKSU, download the WKSU Media Kit.

(WKSU Media Kit PDF icon )


Donate Your Vehicle to WKSU

Programs Schedule Make A Pledge Member BenefitsFAQ/HelpContact Us
Courts and Crime


Ohio's Supreme Court will take another look at DNA and death row
Tyrone Noling's case and changes in state law get a review this week
by WKSU's M.L. SCHULTZE


Web Editor
M.L. Schultze
 
In The Region:

The Ohio Supreme Court will hear arguments tomorrow in a case in which DNA evidence that cleared a man has actually helped keep him on death row. WKSU’s M.L. Schultze has more on a change in Ohio law – and whether it applies to the case of Tyrone Noling.

SCHULTZE: The Supreme Court review of Noling's case

Other options:
Windows Media / MP3 Download (1:17)


In April 1990, someone ransacked the southern Portage County home of Cora and Bearnhardt Hartig and shot the elderly couple to a death. Six years later, a jury decided that someone was Tyrone Noling, and he’s been on death row since.

Noling and the Ohio Innocence Project have repeatedly noted that no physical evidence linked Noling to the crime – no fingerprints, weapons or DNA.

The DNA argument is what the Ohio Supreme Court is considering.

Investigators had found a cigarette butt in the Hartig’s drivewayand tested it in 1993. The results excluded Noling and a co-defendant.

Fifteen years later, Noling pushed for retesting after discovering that investigators found the saliva was a possible match with another man, who had lived nearby was executed in 2009 in a separate case.

But the law back then said if DNA had been definitively tested once, a judge could not order a retest. So even though the DNA did not implicate Noling, it allowed no testing with new technology.

Ohio changed that law in 2010. It now allows new tests if there are advances in DNA science and if there’s a strong chance it will identify the true culprit.

Noling tried again.

But a judge rejected Noling’s appeal anew – citing another provision of the law saying once a motion for new testing is denied, a judge cannot consider new motions seeking retesting.  

Add Your Comment
Name:

Location:

E-mail: (not published, only used to contact you about your comment)


Comments:




 
Page Options

Print this page

E-Mail this page / Send mp3

Share on Facebook




Stories with Recent Comments

Will Ohio's marijuana initiative follow casinos' lead?
We just ask to have marijuana legalized and here comes some nimrod trying to rob us of our rights and make us buy it from some legalized new type DRUG DEALER th...

Fancy dinners from humble beginnings at The Blue Door
Grandma of Chris Miller moved to Florida in a retirement community but I sure miss the Falls and the Blue Door, and the fine service and the true friendship of ...

The Black Keys guitar tech's moment in the spotlight
Nice job, Vivian. It's always nice to hear about the unsung heroes getting their due! Thank you, Chuck Johnston (Full disclosure - I'm a friend of the Carney fa...

A guide for gift-shopping for older Ohians
I'll never be to old for peanut brittle.

Akron's Tuba Christmas: A resounding blast of holiday spirit
Nice piece, Vivian! Looking forward to hearing you move from flute to tuba on Saturday. Love hearing your interviews and this seemed extra special since I kno...

Cleveland Hugo Boss workers are fighting for their jobs again
Bro. Ginard; I support your effert to keep your jobs, I understand all about concesions, I was a Union offical from 1965 until 1991 and the company th...

Asian Carp control could benefit from bill passed by House, heading to the Senate
help me fight the battle against invasive carp by method of harvest

Ohio's Portman supports lifting limits on party political money
If Portman was legitimately concerned about outside groups influence on elections he would have supported the DISCLOSE act. Instead he helped block it being bro...

Study shows trade with China has cost more than 3 million U.S. jobs
I disagree with James Dorn! If we don't change the playing field and make it a fair competition the whole US industry will be weaker and weaker. Eventually all ...

Copyright © 2014 WKSU Public Radio, All Rights Reserved.

 
In Partnership With:

NPR PRI Kent State University

listen in windows media format listen in realplayer format Car Talk Hosts: Tom & Ray Magliozzi Fresh Air Host: Terry Gross A Service of Kent State University 89.7 WKSU | NPR.Classical.Other smart stuff. NPR Senior Correspondent: Noah Adams Living on Earth Host: Steve Curwood 89.7 WKSU | NPR.Classical.Other smart stuff. A Service of Kent State University