News
News Home
Quick Bites
Exploradio
News Archive
News Channel
Special Features
NPR
nowplaying
On AirNewsClassical
Loading...
  
School Closings
WKSU Support
Funding for WKSU is made possible in part through support from the following businesses and organizations.

Akron General

Lehmans

NOCHE


For more information on how your company or organization can support WKSU, download the WKSU Media Kit.

(WKSU Media Kit PDF icon )


Donate Your Vehicle to WKSU

Programs Schedule Make A Pledge Member BenefitsFAQ/HelpContact Us
Courts and Crime


JobsOhio lawsuit is thrown out on grounds of legal standing
Ohio Supreme Court will not rule on constitutionality of the public-private entity at this time
by WKSU's STATEHOUSE BUREAU CHIEF KAREN KASLER


Reporter
Karen Kasler
 
Judith French wrote the majority decision that two lawmakers and a liberal group have no standing to challenge JobOhio's constitutionality.
Courtesy of File photo
Download (WKSU Only)
In The Region:
The Ohio Supreme Court’s decision on JobsOhio does not say anything about whether the legislature’s creation of that public-private entity was constitutional. That question could not be answered until the court decided who had the legal right to ask it.
LISTEN: KASLER ON RULING

Other options:
Windows Media / MP3 Download (3:33)


The court ruled 5-2 that Progress Ohio and two Democratic state lawmakers have no personal stake in the outcome and so cannot challenge the law that created JobsOhio. They had argued that they did have the right to sue for several reasons, one of them being that they're taxpayers.

Jonathan Adler is a professor at Case Western Reserve University School of Law, and he says the court’s decision is the right one.

“If you have broad taxpayer standing or even broader public-rights standing, as has been argued by the plaintiffs here, you basically allow for every political dispute to become a judicial dispute," Adler says. "And that’s corrosive both to our political system and to the judicial process.”

A question of standing
The question of legal standing has come up in several cases, including one before the Ohio Supreme Court that was waiting on this ruling. It is a lawsuit over Gov. John Kasich’s decision to allow video slot machines at horse-racing tracks and was filed by the conservative Ohio Roundtable. David Zanotti is the president.

“We have a great amount of sympathy for the folks at Progress Ohio because standing is a very serious question, and we respect the questions that Progress Ohio is bringing to the table," Zanotti says. "And those questions really have to do with accountability in government, and what happens when one branch exceeds their constitutional authority.”

Who has standing?
The majority justices said their decision does not mean no one has standing, and that there are several people and groups that were identified in the case who could potentially bring a claim against the law. And the justices write that the courthouse doors are open to them. But Zanotti is concerned about how they might determine what defines an injured party in a given challenge to a state law, policy or constitutional issue.

“So the question of standing becomes you have to be uniquely harmed, or concretely harmed, or they add all these adverbs to the nature of harm -- and say that the courts exist to permit standing only to people that have unique, concrete, specific, verifiable, whatever terms in regards to standing," Zanotti says.

But Adler says the decision may not have that long a reach.

“There’s no one who had standing before this decision that’s going to lose it as a result," Adler says. "But on the other hand, various individuals or groups would have had trouble establishing standing before this decision, the decision is not going to help them either.”

Minority Dissent
Justices Paul Pfeifer and William O’Neill broke with the majority, which is not much of a surprise to many court watchers given their pointed questions during the arguments in the case in November.

Pfeifer’s dissent includes some strong words for his colleagues in the majority, and noted that this is the third time the court has been asked about the constitutionality of JobsOhio. Though the majority writes that Pfeifer is incorrect, he says this decision ensures they will not ever answer it. He also writes, “Ohioans will never know whether their government is violating the Constitution. Apparently, they do not deserve to know.”

O’Neill, the only Democrat on the court, writes that hundreds of millions of dollars are being funneled into a dark hole, and “it is simply shameful that the court refused to do its job.”

Add Your Comment
Name:

Location:

E-mail: (not published, only used to contact you about your comment)


Comments:




 
Page Options

Print this page

E-Mail this page / Send mp3

Share on Facebook




Stories with Recent Comments

An amendment to an Ohio agriculture bill may kill whole bill
I hope the Gov. sticks to his veto, Att takes more out of this state than it puts in.

From warehouse to writer: Terry Pluto's Thanksgiving thank you
Dear Terry: On my 8th cup of coffee trying to get Thanksgiving "Brunch" done ahead of time because I work nights. However, I just had to stop to contact yo...

The first big private gift comes in for the pro football HOF project
The HOF has needed a shot in the arm for many years and this project will go a long way to getting the attraction the attention it deserves (next: upgrad...

Environmental study nears completion in East Liverpool
Twenty years ago my twin sister and I protested the building and operation of the WTI facility citing several studies that indicated the risk of cancer due to ...

HOF's Canton expansion could take an island and make it a village
I live in the block from Broad St to the Hall of Fame and will be impacted by the expansion. I am in the process of selling my home and planned to long before i...

Cleveland redeploys police to replace rejected red-light traffic cameras
Periodic rotational enforcement without warning does NOT change behavior and the city officials know that. This is the basis of all officer-run enforcement trap...

New enrollment period offers more insurance options
The removal of federal funding for healthcare CO-OPs may limit the growth of the CO-OP movement. http://www.healthcaretownhall.com/?p=6381

The family of Boardman vet killed in Vietnam receives his medals
My name is Mike Eisenbraun. I am Larry's brother. I was 14 years old when Larry was killed in Vietnam. He has been gone for 46 years but it seems like yester...

Cleveland seniors are creating new wealth -- and facing new challenges
Why is anyone surprised that we people over 65 are not retiring? If you have been paying attention, defined company funded pensions were phasing out in the eigh...

Copyright © 2014 WKSU Public Radio, All Rights Reserved.

 
In Partnership With:

NPR PRI Kent State University

listen in windows media format listen in realplayer format Car Talk Hosts: Tom & Ray Magliozzi Fresh Air Host: Terry Gross A Service of Kent State University 89.7 WKSU | NPR.Classical.Other smart stuff. NPR Senior Correspondent: Noah Adams Living on Earth Host: Steve Curwood 89.7 WKSU | NPR.Classical.Other smart stuff. A Service of Kent State University