NOTE: This is the second of three stories examining Ohio's environmental and energy future.
A decision to block a plan that would’ve guaranteed profits for struggling coal plants in Ohio may have created a domino effect for the future of energy in the state.
In part two of a three-part series, Statehouse correspondent Andy Chow takes a look at the history of deregulation in Ohio and the bombshell suggestion to reverse course.
But the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission -- or FERC -- stepped in and blocked the so-called Power Purchase Agreements.
“We have no interest in getting involved into a protracted FERC-state jurisdictional dispute," responded AEP CEO Nick Akins on a call with investors just a day after FERC made its decision.
The decision by the feds leaves Ohio’s utilities asking a lot of questions about what they’ll do next with their coal plants. Akins was the first to drop the most dramatic option.
“We’ll push for re-regulation in the Ohio Legislature in order to repeal and replace S.B. 221 or enable the transfer of and cost-recovery for certain resources at AEP Ohio -- therefore eliminating the need for a PPA.”
That’s a complicated sentence. But the key word there is “re-regulation.”
A re-regulated utilities industry means you’d be paying for electricity at more of a fixed rate. A deregulated system that promotes competition among a lot of energy generators would bring electricity at its lowest cost.
To understand the true significance that comes with even thinking about re-regulating, you’d have to retrace the steps that brought us to this point.
The first attempt to deregulate the industry started in 1992 in hopes of lowering costs, offering more reliability and creating more diversity. It then took seven years to finally pass both chambers of the Ohio Legislature and become law.
But regulators and legislators will tell you that was just the beginning.
“It has now been 17 years and it may be a little late in the game to put that toothpaste back in the tube.”
Republican Sen. Bill Seitz of Cincinnati has been in the Legislature for most of this journey. Since 1999, lawmakers have spent a lot of time and energy to pass laws that built the framework for deregulation.
Seitz says he’s open to having the conversation about re-regulation. But the culture crafted in the last 17 years means others are playing a role in the debate. It's not just the heavy hitters like FirstEnergy and AEP, but new energy providers that have come into the state ready to compete.
“There are a great many of new players in Ohio as a result of deregulation that were not here in 1999. They are going to -- I think -- cry foul at any attempt to re-regulate that would inhibit their ability to be a competitive supplier.”
That’s where Todd Snitchler comes in. He represents a coalition of these new energy suppliers, a big one being Dynegy, which came into Ohio, bought Duke Energy’s power plants and worked to make them more efficient.
Asked if the major utilities are seeking re-regulation because they’re no longer getting what they want out of the competition, Snitchler said that’s a fair question.
“I’m not aware of any other business that would be able to approach the General Assembly and say, ‘I don’t like the result of a federal agency and I want you to go ahead and fix everything for me and ensure that I can continue to profit at the rate that I’d like to make it at.’”
Like Seitz, Snitchler’s no stranger to Ohio’s march towards deregulation. He chaired the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio from 2011 to 2014 and was in the Ohio House before that.
“It’s been slow. It has been challenging. And I think at this point it’s reached a decision point.”
FirstEnergy and AEP have declined to comment on the issue. Both say they’re working to determine what steps they need to make next.
But the one thing nearly everyone agrees on is that Ohio has reached a critical time where the decisions made now can set the foundation for energy generation and electric bills for many years to come.